The Limits of Medical Authority of Midwives in the Delegation of Authority by Obstetricians

Main Article Content

Achwan
Rommy Hardyansah
Yeni Vitrianingsih
Fayola Issalillah
Rafadi Khan Khayru

Abstract

The delegation of duties from specialist obstetricians to midwives has become a prevalent practice in areas with limited access to specialist medical personnel. However, this practice gives rise to numerous legal issues concerning the scope of authority, legal accountability, and patient safety. This study aims to examine the forms of legal liability associated with such delegation and to evaluate the effectiveness of existing regulations. Employing a normative juridical approach, data are analyzed with reference to pertinent legal instruments such as Law No. 17 of 2023 and Minister of Health Regulation No. 1464/MENKES/PER/X/2010. The findings indicate that delegations that do not adhere to legal standards can result in civil, criminal, and administrative consequences. In the civil context, delegations that cause harm may be subject to litigation as unlawful acts. From a criminal perspective, midwives who act beyond their authority and cause serious patient harm may incur criminal sanctions. Administratively, violations of practice license regulations may result in the revocation of professional licenses. Based on these findings, this study recommends stricter regulatory oversight, enhanced training for midwives, and improved referral systems to ensure that delegation practices are conducted legally and safely.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Achwan, Hardyansah, R., Vitrianingsih, Y. ., Issalillah, F. ., & Khayru, R. K. . (2023). The Limits of Medical Authority of Midwives in the Delegation of Authority by Obstetricians. Journal of Social Science Studies, 3(2), 153-160. https://jos3journals.id/index.php/jos3/article/view/265

References

Baunegoro, T. C., Elwina, M., & Kurnia, E. (2022). Criminal Liability of Doctors Who Delegate the Authority to Take Medical Actions on Nurses that Cause Patients to Die (Case Study of the Decision of the Sidoarjo District Court Number: 1165/PID.B/2010/PN.SDA). Soepra Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan, 7(2), 242-258.

Danilova, A. G. (2022). The Dialectical Nature of Legal Responsibility for the Violation of Legislation on the Prevention of the Emergence and Spread of Particularly Dangerous Infectious Diseases. University Scientific Notes, 3(87), 59-72.

Dharmawan, D., & Jonathan, I. (2019). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Praktik Tukang Gigi yang Melebihi Wewenangnya. Interest: Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 8(1), 121-129.

Fadilah, R. (2020). Peran Regulasi dalam Pelimpahan Wewenang Dokter dan Keselamatan Pasien. Jurnal Etika Kedokteran Indonesia, 7(3), 56-70.

Hadjon, P. M., & Hakim, R. (2019). Hukum Administrasi dan Pertanggungjawaban Profesi Kesehatan. Malang: Setara Press.

Intan, A. M., Andrianto, W. A., & Muthiarani, R. (2022). Delegation of Authority within Medical Procedures from Doctors to Nurses Based on Health Law (Case Study Number 1167/Pid.B/2010/PN.Sda). Soepra Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan, 8(1), 26-39.

Kementerian Kesehatan. (2010). Peraturan Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 1464/MENKES/PER/X/2010 tentang Izin dan Praktik Bidan. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia.

Magrath, P. (2022). Regulating Midwives: Foreclosing Alternatives in the Policymaking Process in West Java, Indonesia. Anthropologies of Global Maternal and Reproductive Health: From Policy Spaces to Sites of Practice, 139-158.

Mahalia, M., Elwina, M., & Sulistiyanto, H. (2022). Legal Responsibilities of Independent Practice Midwives in Implementing Reference as an Effort to Save Mothers and Babies in Sukamara Regency, Kalimantan Province. Soepra, 8(1), 120-128.

Manala, A. A. (2016). Pelaksanaan Wewenang Perawat untuk Konsultasi dan Kolaborasi dengan Dokter dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 38 Tahun 2014 tentang Keperawatan (Studi di RSUD Dr. Soedirman Kebumen). Jurnal Idea Hukum, 2(2), 389-401.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Parsa, E., Abbasi, M., Manshadi, R., & Jafari, M. H. (2019). Study on Legal Nature of Liability Arising from Negligence in Prenatal Diagnosis: Experience from UK. The Iranian Journal of Medical Law, 12(47), 197-221.

Purwandi, A. (2019). Kekuatan Hukum Penyerahan Wewenang Medis dan Infoconsent oleh Dokter Kepada Perawat berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 38 Tahun 2014 tentang Keperawatan. Jurnal Yustitia, 20(1), 83-100.

Rahardjo, S. (2000). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2023 Nomor 105. Sekretariat Negara, Jakarta.

Saragih, F. (2020). Kewenangan Bidan dalam Tindakan Medis dan Tanggung Jawabnya. Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan, 8(3), 44-58.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2009). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Suminar, S. R., & Mufidi, H. M. F. (2019). The Indonesian Law Perspective on the Authority of Beauty Practitioners in Performing Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. In Social and Humaniora Research Symposium, 307, 54-58.

Sutrisno, A. (2018). Risiko Hukum dalam Pelimpahan Wewenang Medis. Jurnal Hukum dan Kesehatan, 11(2), 72-85.

Sylvana, Y., Firmansyah, Y., & Haryanto, I. (2021). Legal Delegasi (Pelimpahan Wewenang Medis) Dokter Kepada Perawat Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum. Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 1(12), 1632-1646.

Widiyono. (2004). Wewenang dan Tanggung Jawab. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

World Health Organization. (2019). Patient Safety and Medical Errors: Global Report. Geneva: WHO.

Zakariya, H., Rudatyo, R., Ismiyanto, I., & Zanuar, K. M. Z. (2022). Aspects of Legal Protection Against Midwife Profession in Indonesia. JMNS: Journal of Midwifery and Nursing Studies, 4(1), 1-9.