Responsibilities of Digital Marketplace Platforms and Anticompetitive Assessments in Business Law

Main Article Content

Dharma Setiawan Negara
Muhammad Alvin Jauhari
Didit Darmawan

Abstract

This article examines competition law in the digital marketplace sector, focusing on the regulation of platforms' duties and responsibilities towards merchants and consumers. The research uses a normative juridical method based on qualitative literature studies and thematic synthesis of relevant legislation and verified academic doctrines. The analysis positions marketplaces as trade service providers that regulate market access through terms of service, interface design, and data-based decisions. The first finding shows that the construction of platform obligations towards consumers rests on the obligations of information honesty, transaction security, data protection, and the provision of enforceable loss recovery. Towards merchants, platform obligations include fair treatment, transparency of commission and promotion terms, orderly account enforcement procedures, and the provision of a secure and well-functioning system as a prerequisite for business certainty. The second finding formulates normative measures to assess potentially anti-competitive actions through access arrangements, ranking, and service policies. These measures assess the relevant market and market power, then test whether the policies create artificial barriers to entry, discrimination without objective justification, self-preferencing, service tying or bundling, and consumer steering restrictions through anti-steering. The assessment is conducted using a rule of reason approach that weighs the consequences of exclusion and consumer harm against efficiency justifications and less restrictive alternatives. The article emphasizes the importance of procedural accountability, including notification of policy changes, testable reasons, effective appeal channels, and data management that limits conflicts of interest. The practical implication is the need for internal governance that documents policy objectives, ranking parameters at the category level, and records of sanctions imposed for auditing purposes. Platforms are encouraged to establish data access separation between business units, account recovery mechanisms, and rapid security incident reporting. For regulators, the results of this study support the development of PMSE compliance and the strengthening of dispute resolution coordination. For the market, the application of these normative measures is expected to maintain quality-based competition, reasonable prices, and transaction trust, as well as minimize uncertainty for small traders and consumers in daily transactions in the marketplace.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Negara, D. S., Jauhari, M. A. ., & Darmawan, D. . (2024). Responsibilities of Digital Marketplace Platforms and Anticompetitive Assessments in Business Law. Journal of Social Science Studies, 4(1), 407-422. https://jos3journals.id/index.php/jos3/article/view/327

References

Achmad, A. S., & Indradewi, A. A. (2023). Online Marketplace’s Role and Legal Responsibilities on “Official Store” Restrictions to Implement Fair Competition Principle. Yuridika, 38(3), 443-458.

Ali, R., & Darmawan, D. (2023). Big Data Management Optimization for Managerial Decision Making and Business Strategy. Journal of Social Science Studies, 3(2), 139-144.

Ali, R., Wahyu, F. R. M., Darmawan, D., Retnowati, E., & Lestari, U. P. (2022). Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth, Perceived Service Quality and Perceived Usefulness on Alibaba's Customer Commitment. Journal of Business and Economics Research, 3(2), 232-237.

Anugroh, Y. G., Hardyansah, R., Darmawan, D., Khayru, R. K., & Putra, A. R. (2023). Consumer Protection and Responsibilities of E-commerce Platforms in Ensuring the Smooth Process of Returning Goods in COD Transactions. Journal of Social Science Studies, 3(2), 89-94.

Asil, U. C. (2023). Unveiling Dominance: Abusive Practices in Digital Markets-An Analysis of the Market Platforms’ Dominant Position and the EU’s Regulatory Countermeasures. LUP Student Paper, 1-66.

Bergqvist, C. (2020). Discrimination and Self-Favoring in the Digital Economy. Social Science Research Network, 3531688.

Bergqvist, C., & Faustinelli, E. (2020). Multi-Sided Platforms – Legal Implications of Definitional Gaps. Social Science Research Network, 4293975.

Bintarawati, F. (2022). Juridical Analysis of Consumer Protection against Buying and Selling Fraud in the Market Place. Walisongo Law Review, 4(1), 49-68.

Busch, C. (2020). Self-Regulation and Regulatory Intermediation in the Platform Economy. In the Role of the EU in Transnational Legal Ordering, 115-134.

Colangelo, G. (2023). Antitrust Unchained: The EU’s Case Against Self-Preferencing. GRUR International, 72(6), 538-556.

Confido, J. V. (2023). Regulation For E-Commerce Platform Providers in Indonesia: Importance and Effectiveness. Lex Prospicit, 1(1), 15-38.

Darmawan, D. (2022). Environmental Accountability through Business Ethics, Responsibility, Morals and Legal Obligations. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 1(2), 1-6.

Darmawan, D. (2022). Salesperson Interaction Quality and Consumer Decisions in Online Transactions. Journal of Social Science Studies, 2(2), 91-98.

Darmawan, D., & Gatheru, J. (2021). Understanding Impulsive Buying Behavior in Marketplace. Journal of Social Science Studies, 1(1), 11-18.

Deutscher, E. (2022). Reshaping Digital Competition: The New Platform Regulations and the Future of Modern Antitrust. Sage Journal: The Antitrust Bulletin, 67(2), 302-340.

Fared, M. A., Darmawan, D., & Khairi, M. (2021). Contribution of E-Service Quality to Repurchase Intention with Mediation of Customer Satisfaction: Study of Online Shopping Through Marketplace. Journal of Marketing and Business Research (MARK), 1(2), 93-106.

Funta, R. (2019). Economic and Legal Features of Digital Markets. Danube: Law Economics and Social Issues Review, 10(2), 173-183.

Gardi, B., & Darmawan, D. (2022). Study of Shopping Lifestyle, Sales Promotion and Impulsive Buying Behavior. Journal of Marketing and Business Research (MARK), 2(2), 125-134.

Haganta, R. (2020). Legal Protection of Personal Data as Privacy Rights of E-Commerce Consumers Amid the Covid-19 Pandemic. Lex Scientia Law Review, 4(2), 77-90.

Hagiu, A., & Wright, J. (2015). Multi-Sided Platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 43, 162–174.

Hermawan, A. W., & Pramana, Y. (2022). Secondary Liability and Safe Harbors for Platform Providers in Indonesian E-Commerce Law. Scientium Law Review (SLR), 1(3), 101-108.

Hirayama, K., & Arai, K. (2021). Interaction between Information Law and Competition Law: Organizing Regulatory Perspectives on Platform Businesses. Asian Journal of Law and Economics, 12(2), 171-188.

Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia. Jakarta.

Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia. Jakarta.

Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia. Jakarta.

Infante, A., & Mardikaningsih, R. (2022). The Potential of Social Media as a Means of Online Business Promotion. Journal of Social Science Studies, 2(2), 45-49.

Jürgensmeier, L., & Skiera, B. (2023). Measuring Fair Competition on Digital Platforms. Social Science Research Network.

Kemarauwana, M., & Darmawan, D. (2020). Perceived Ease of Use Contribution to Behavioral Intention in Digital Payment. Journal of Science, Technology and Society (SICO), 1(1), 1–4.

Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2023). Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 2023 tentang Penyelenggara Perdagangan Melalui Sistem Elektronik. Jakarta.

Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Republik Indonesia. (Tanpa Tahun). Peraturan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Republik Indonesia tentang Pedoman dan Tata Cara Penanganan Perkara serta Pedoman Penilaian Perilaku dalam Kerangka Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999. Jakarta.

Kurniasari, T. W., & Rahman, A. S. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Usaha Umkm terhadap Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan Platform Digital: Marketplace Melalui Penetapan Harga dan Penguasaan Pasar. Reusam: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum, 10(2), 131-153.

Muhammad, A. I., Saputra, R., Pakpahan, N. H., Darmawan, D., & Khayru, R. K. (2023). Ethics and Legality in the Dissemination of Information on Traffic Accident Victims Through Digital Media. Journal of Social Science Studies, 3(2), 235-244.

Murti, I. P. Y., Mulyati, E., & Permata, R. R. (2023). The Dominant Position of Marketplaces in Cooperation Agreements with Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) Referred to the Principle of Balance. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 5(1), 143-168.

Parker, G. G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2005). Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design. Management Science, 51(10), 1494–1504.

Perkasa, J., & Saly, J. N. (2022). Legal Liability of Marketplace Companies Against Leaking of User Data Due to Third Party Breaking According to Law Number 8 of 1999 Concerning Consumer Protection (Case Example: Tokopedia User Data Leaking in 2020). In 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities, 606-614.

Purwanto, I., Darmawan, D., Dirgantara, F., & Halizah, S. N. (2023). Implementation of Cosmetic Product Labeling Regulations for Consumer Protection and Fair Competition in the Marketplace. Journal of Social Science Studies, 3(1), 165-170.

Ramle, N. L. B., & Mardikaningsih, R. (2022). Inclusivity in Technology-Based Services: Access and Skills Challenges. Journal of Social Science Studies, 2(2), 225-230.

Rysman, M. (2009). The Economics of Two-Sided Markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(3), 125–143.

Saputra, H. (2023). Peran Marketplace dalam Memberikan Perlindungan terhadap Konsumen menurut Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. Ganec Swara, 17(4), 2200.

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Sage Publications, London.

Sinambela, E. A., & Darmawan, D. (2022). Strengths and Weaknesses of Using Electronic Money as a Substitute for Cash. Journal of Social Science Studies, 2(2), 56-61.

Susanti, D. O. (2022). The Electronic Market (Marketplace) on Electronic Trade (E-Commerce) in Indonesia. Notariil: Jurnal Kenotariatan, 7(1), 24-31.

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45-55.

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.

Tsary, S. R. (2022). Consumer Legal Protection on Electronic Transactions through the Platform without the Collective Account Features by Trusted Third Parties. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 5(10), 2697-2704.

van der Donk, B. (2022). Ex-ante and Ex-post Access Restrictions in Marketplaces’ Terms of Service. European Review of Private Law, 30(6), 899-1122.

Wahyuningtyas, S. Y. (2017). Abuse of Dominance in Non-Negotiable Privacy Policy in the Digital Market. European Business Organization Law Review, 18(4), 785-800.

Wibowo, A. S., Darmawan, D., Halizah, S. N., & Mardikaningsih, R. (2023). Optimizing the Principles of Healthy Business Competition and the Role of KPPU for a Fair Economy in the Digital Era. Journal of Social Science Studies, 3(1), 95-100.

Wicaksena, B. (2022). Analisis Komitmen dan Kemampuan Pelaku Usaha Marketplace terhadap Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 80 Tahun 2019. Cendekia Niaga, 6(2), 138-155.