Societal Perceptions of Smart City Initiatives and Urban Resi-dents' Quality of Life
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
Smart city initiatives promise significant improvements in urban residents' quality of life through technological innovations, yet their adoption depends greatly on societal perceptions. This study explores the various perceptions held by urban communities toward smart city development, focusing on factors such as privacy concerns, socioeconomic disparities, cultural attitudes, participatory governance, and environmental awareness. Utilizing a comprehensive literature review method, the research synthesizes scholarly sources to reveal the multifaceted societal viewpoints influencing the effectiveness of urban technological projects. Findings indicate that public acceptance predominantly hinges on perceived benefits aligning with residents' immediate needs and tangible improvements in urban infrastructure and services. Conversely, skepticism arises from concerns over data privacy breaches, inequitable resource distribution, cultural insensitivity, and inadequate community participation. Furthermore, transparent communication and accountable governance practices significantly enhance public confidence in technological interventions. Consequently, understanding these perception-based variables is crucial for city planners and policymakers aiming to implement effective and widely accepted smart city initiatives. Recommendations suggest prioritizing community involvement, equitable resource distribution, adaptive technological strategies, and rigorous privacy standards. This research contributes to urban studies by highlighting essential societal considerations necessary for successful smart city development, ultimately supporting the enhancement of urban residents' quality of life.
Rincian Artikel
Bagian
Cara Mengutip
Referensi
Ashaye, O. R., & Alharahsheh, H. H. (2021). Smart City Development and Implications. In Handbook of Research on Driving Transformational Change in the Digital Built Enviroment IGI Global, 467-473.
Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G., & Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart Cities of the Future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 481-518.
Bellone, C., Ranucci, P., & Geropanta, V. (2018). The ‘Governance’ for Smart City Strategies and Territorial Planning. Springer Nature Switzerland, 76-86.
Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart Cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65-82.
Chatterjee, U., Bhunia, G. S., Mahata, D., & Singh, U. (2021). Smart Cities and Their Role in Enhancing Quality of Life. CRC Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Deakin, M., & Al Waer, H. (2011). From Intelligent to Smart Cities. Journal of Intelligent Buildings International, 3(3), 140-152.
Fernandez-Anez, V., Fernández-Güell, J. M., & Giffinger, R. (2011). Smart Cities Planning. European Journal of Spatial Development, (43), 1-15.
Geropanta, V. (2020). The Smart City in Relation to its Environment, Perception, and Urban Planning Process: Lessons for Developing Countries. Perception, Design and Ecology of the Built Environment: A Focus on the Global South, 547-561.
Giffinger, R. (2019). Smart City: The Importance of Innovation and Planning. In International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT System, 1271, 28-39.
Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities, and the Urban Condition. Routledge.
Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the Real Smart City Please Stand Up?. Routledge, 12(3), 303-320.
Komninos, N. (2009). Intelligent Cities: Towards Interactive and Global Innovation Environments. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(4), 337-355.
Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (6th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Oliveira, T. A., Oliver, M., & Ramalhinho, H. (2020). Challenges for Connecting Citizens and Smart Cities: ICT, E-Governance and Blockchain. Sustainability, 12(7), 1-21.
Oliveira, V. A. T., & Santos, G. D. (2019). Information Technology Acceptance in Public Safety in Smart Sustainable Cities: A Qualitative Analysis. Procedia Manufacturing, 39(2019), 1929-1936.
San Martín, H., García-de-los-Salmones, M. M., & Herrero-Crespo, Á. (2020). Citizen Perceptions and Support for Smart City Projects: The Case of “Smart Santander.” In Handbook of Research on Smart Territories and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems for Social Innovation and Sustainable Growth. IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 107-123.
Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., & Oliveira, A. (2011). Smart Cities and the Future Internet. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6656, 431-446.
Sepasgozar, S. M. E., Hawken, S., Sargolzaei, S., & Foroozanfa, M. (2019). Implementing Citizen Centric Technology in Developing Smart Cities: A Model for Predicting the Acceptance of Urban Technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 105-116.
Shimizu, Y., Osaki, S., Hashimoto, T., & Karasawa, K. (2021). The Social Acceptance of Collecting and Utilizing Personal Information in Smart Cities. Sustainability, 13(16), 1-10.
Smith, H. J. (2007). Information Privacy and its Management. MIS Quarterly, 31(2), 477-497.
Soomro, K., Khan, Z., & Ludlow, D. (2017). Participatory Governance in Smart Cities: The UrbanAPI Case Study. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 23(5-6), 419-444.
Vanolo, A. (2012). Smartmentality: The Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy. Urban Studies, 51(5), 883-898.
Wu, W., Wu, Y. J., & Wang, H. (2021). Perceived City Smartness Level and Technical Information Transparency: The Acceptance Intention of Health Information Technology During a Lockdown. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 1-12.